How to Read Results From Silica Standard

J Occup Environ Hyg. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 Jan 2.

Published in last edited form equally:

PMCID: PMC4698134

NIHMSID: NIHMS747102

Assessment of Respirable Crystalline Silica Analysis Using Proficiency Belittling Testing Results from 2003–2013

Abstract

Assay of Proficiency Analytical Testing (PAT) results betwixt 2003 and 2013 suggest that the variation in respirable crystalline silica analysis is much smaller today than it was in the period 1990–1998, partly because of a change in sample product procedure and because the colorimetric method has been phased out, although quality improvements in the x-ray diffraction (XRD) or infrared (IR) methods may have also played a role. In that location is no practical difference between laboratories using XRD or IR methods or betwixt laboratories which are accredited or those which are not. Reference laboratory means (assigned values) are not dissimilar from the means of all participants across the current range of mass loading, although there is a modest deviation in variance in the ratios of all participants to reference laboratory means based on method because the reference laboratories are much more than likely to use XRD than are the others. Matrix interference does not lead to biases or substantially larger variances for either XRD or IR methods. Data from proficiency test sample analyses that include results from poorly performing laboratories should not be used to determine the validity of a method. PAT samples are not produced below 40 μg and variance may increment with lower masses, although this is not specially predictable. PAT data from lower mass loadings will exist required to evaluate analytical operation if exposure limits are lowered without change in sampling method. Task-specific exposure measurements for periods shorter than a full shift typically effect in lower mass loadings and the quality of these analyses would also be meliorate assured from being within the range of PAT mass loadings. High menstruum rate cyclones, whose performance has been validated, tin exist used to obtain higher mass loadings in environments of lower concentrations or where shorter sampling times are desired.

INTRODUCTION

Inhalation of respirable crystalline silica (RCS) is known to be associated with adverse health outcomes. Exposure to RCS is assessed by pulling a known amount of air through a personal size-selective sampler and filter, and and then measuring the silica collected on the filter. Industrial hygiene laboratories use one of three analytical techniques (Ten-ray diffraction spectrometry (XRD), infrared absorption spectrometry (IR), and colorimetric spectrophotometry) for the quantitative conclusion of RCS. Interlaboratory variability historically has been high for these analyses. Agreement between laboratories, every bit measured through analyses reported to the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) Proficiency Analytical Testing (PAT) program over the menstruum April 1990 through Apr 1998, has been studied and the results published.⁽¹⁾ In that study, colorimetric analysis was more commonly used than today and the main conclusion was that it showed relatively poor recovery at low loadings and overall poor precision compared to XRD and IR methods. Since that time, in that location take been several factors that may have farther affected the variability of analyses, including a tendency in the reduction in the number of laboratories using the colorimetric method.

The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH^®) proposed reducing their Threshold Limit Value (TLV^®) for RCS in 2004 and adopted 0.025 mgm⁻³ as an eight-60 minutes time-weighted average (TWA) in 2006.⁽²⁾ This is an advisory limit; legal limits in the United States are fix past the U.Due south. Occupational Rubber and Health Administration (OSHA) and are known as Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs). OSHA is engaged in rulemaking with respect to exposure and control of respirable crystalline silica to better prevent the onset of disease.⁽ⁱⁱⁱ⁾ The proposed rule includes a lower PEL for airborne RCS, and actions triggered by measurements below this limit (an "action level"). Limits under scrutiny include a potential PEL of 0.05 mgm⁻³ and an action level of 0.025 mgm⁻³.

The loftier variability of RCS analyses leads to questions regarding belittling capabilities to back up lowered limits, which can be investigated through a new assessment of information from the AIHA PAT program. The AIHA moved the PAT plan in 2009 into a carve up Limited Liability Company (AIHA PAT, LLC) and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and AIHA PAT, LLC signed a Alphabetic character of Agreement in 2013 to allow data-sharing. NIOSH received the results reported for RCS proficiency sample analysis for all participating laboratories from Round 152 in January 2003 through Round 194 in July 2013 (with accreditation status of the participants from Round 171 in October 2007, onwards). These have been studied to make up one's mind whether there has been whatever improvement in variability since the previous Eller et al. publication.^(ane)

Contributing to the variability in the overall PAT program results is the variability inherent in the sample product. Prior to Circular 162 in July, 2005, the production procedure involved sampling an aerosol of RCS generated in a large sleeping accommodation through private size-selective cyclones with filters. Thus whatsoever spatial inhomogeneity of the aerosol in the sleeping accommodation, inter-unit variability in cyclone separation performance, and variability in the scale and maintenance of pump menstruation charge per unit contributed to the overall sample variance. In 2004 (reported 2005), a study of PAT Samples and field samples showed that particles collected in cassettes attached to cyclones could deposit on the internal not-filter surfaces of the cassettes.^(iv) Variability in the fraction of aspiration depositing on the filter versus other surfaces likely contributed to the variability in PAT Sample results. In Round 162 production was switched to a liquid-intermission (slurry) and deposition process that could provide lower sample variability. In the last 15 years there have as well been several initiatives that may have led to further improvements in the inter-laboratory variability of RCS analyses. A comprehensive survey was carried out past the AIHA in collaboration with NIOSH on the practices being used by laboratories engaged in these analyses, which uncovered issues that needed to be addressed, including the calibration material and the levels and frequency of calibration, likewise every bit deviations in procedures from the published methods. A series of recommendations was published⁽⁵⁾ and on-site auditors from the AIHA laboratory accreditation programme were given back up through checklists and training on bug critical to skillful quality RCS assay.

METHODS

Each laboratory had been assigned a unique serial number in the data provided by the AIHA PAT, LLC so that the identities of laboratories are not known to NIOSH. Rounds of PAT Samples are issued on a quarterly basis, with 4 Samples at unlike target mass loadings in each Circular. NIOSH was provided with the reported results for each Sample in each Round for each participating laboratory, together with the analytical method (XRD, IR, or colorimetric) used by the laboratory, and the identity of the background matrix added to the samples for that Round (coal mine dust (CMD), talc, CMD plus talc, or calcite). AIHA PAT LLC was also able to provide the accreditation status of those laboratories from Round 171. Virtually 80% of all laboratories participating in the PAT scheme are accredited for the analysis of silica, with well-nigh two-thirds of these laboratories using XRD, which is a college proportion than for all laboratories mostly.

In that location is no "true value" of the amount of RCS mass on each Sample although there is a target value and a subset of the samples are checked via quality control analyses by the contractor preparing the samples. The target value must exist achieved inside prepare limits (+/− 10%) before the samples are released to participants. The assigned value for each Sample is defined by a sub-group of "reference laboratories" (AIHA PAT, LLC terminology). The average of the values reported past the reference laboratories is compared to the target level required of the Sample provider and to the provider's quality control data, and if these values are considered nether control, the mean value of the reference laboratories later Windsorization (5%–95%) is used as the assigned value. The criteria used for determining a reference laboratory are arguable (an accredited laboratory participating in at least three of the four of the Industrial Hygiene proficiency testing analyses offered by AIHA PAT, LLC and considered proficient for the prior 2 rounds) and a study had been undertaken by NIOSH to determine the effect of switching to the hateful of all laboratories, which suggested that this value could as well be used every bit the assigned value. Hence in the Eller et al. publication^(one) in that location is a statement that the mean of all laboratories will be used in the time to come. However, when this change was made for all industrial hygiene program analytes there was considerable negative feedback from the asbestos analytical laboratories because the hateful of all laboratories in the analysis of chrysotile was sufficiently dissimilar from the mean of reference laboratories for reference laboratories to become non-adept. The change therefore was reversed and reference laboratories have again been used to derive the assigned values since then. Thus, the methodology for determining the assigned value that was used during the period covered by the previous written report was also in employ during the entire period covered by this written report.

Statistical Approach

We have addressed two figures of merit, one being the mean and the other beingness the relative standard deviation (RSD) of results cleaved down every bit below. Less than 5% of results were removed from the data set earlier calculation of means and RSDs. Eighty-eight of these were 44 pairs of initial and re-test results in the data prepare provided. Since the "official" event from each pair could not be determined, all the results were removed. Also removed were any results where the method of analysis was not provided, and whatever results which were more than 3 standard deviations from the hateful, on a Round or per Sample basis. This resulted in a last tally of 9449 observations for assay. The RSDs of the total data ready were compared to those from the Eller et al. study,⁽¹⁾ then cleaved down past analytical method and compared between XRD and IR (insufficient results from the colorimetric method made this comparison unreasonable), and and then broken downwards by accreditation condition and compared for those Rounds where this was known. The ways were as well compared for the same groups between each other and with the assigned values. Comparisons ranked according to the assigned values highlight any consequence of Sample loading.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The 2003–2013 data set up is merely slightly smaller than the 1990–1998 information gear up and the RSD for each Sample is plotted in Figure 1 against the mean sample mass for both information sets. There is a clear difference between the older and newer data, with an improvement in RSD from virtually 29% to 21% fairly consistently across the whole ready. The everyman mass loadings are most the same in both data sets and both data sets show an increase in RSD at lower mass loadings that can exist expected to increase further at masses below the everyman values plotted. There needs to be a potent justification for any model applied to extrapolate outside of the data range as the selection of model will have the strongest effect on the outcome. In particular, non-linear models may not be an accurate reflection of information regarding the procedure under consideration. Therefore, we have elected not to endeavor such an extrapolation here. If the 2003–2013 data are split betwixt Rounds prior to 162 and from 162 onwards (Figure ii), it tin can exist seen that the alter in Sample production process has contributed some of the reduction in variability, but non all. The remainder may exist from the reduction of laboratories using the colorimetric technique or it may be from a general improvement resulting from the use of more appropriate scale materials, more frequent calibration, utilize of a lower mass calibration standard, and stricter adherence to the published method procedures, or a combination of whatever or all of these factors (there is also the possibility that there take been improvements in the analytical equipment). When information sets of this size are analyzed even modest differences can be statistically pregnant, although the difference itself may be practically meaningless. Thus nosotros nowadays the results without determining statistically significant differences.

Comparing old data and new data. (Relative standard deviation (RSD) of RCS PAT Samples from Rounds 152–194, 2003–2013 (New data), compared to Rounds 102–132, 1990–1998 (Old data), according to all-laboratory mean mass loading.

Comparing data circular number >161 and data round number < = 161. (Improvement in relative standard deviation (RSD) of RCS PAT Samples with alter in Sample production from Round 162 onwards (all laboratories).

In Figure 3 we compare XRD and IR analyses in full and in Figure 4 separate co-ordinate to matrix interference. Both XRD and IR methods show higher variability when the matrix is calcite; this was as well observed in the previous study, and was not affected by the alter in Sample production in the current written report period. No explanation has been suggested but it might exist due to greater variability in grain size or mass loading of the calcite, or it may be due to the sample preparation procedure (e.thou., reaction between calcite and silica). The lowest variability is encountered for IR when the matrix is a combination of CMD and talc and this may be because both materials are in smaller quantity than when the individual materials are used. The number of participants using the colorimetric method is now then low that there are Rounds without representation, including all Rounds in the past 3 years and because of these small numbers operation has non been evaluated.

Box–plots of infrared (IR) and x-ray diffraction (XRD) relative standard deviations (RSD) for all RCS PAT Rounds and Samples (all laboratories) (2% departure in average RSDs is statistically meaning only not important).(color effigy avaibale online)

Box-plots for relative standard deviation (RSD) of RCS PAT Samples past infrared (IR) and x-ray diffraction (XRD) methods divided by matrix interference blazon (all laboratories, Rounds 152–194).(color effigy avaibale online)

Accredited and non-accredited laboratories showed like variance. Comparison of means between the reference laboratories and all laboratories needs to exist considered advisedly, since the reference laboratories themselves are a subset of all laboratories. Nevertheless, a consistent bias on the part of non-reference laboratories would be apparent in Figure 5, and would exist more obvious in a plot of reference laboratory ways against the means of not-accredited laboratories (since all reference laboratories are by definition accredited) equally in Figure 6. Any bias between these ii groups could be a result of a divergence in analytical method since reference laboratories are predominantly users of XRD and not-accredited laboratories are predominantly users of IR, merely none can exist seen.

Plot of reference laboratory RCS PAT Sample mean (assigned value) against all-laboratory RCS PAT Sample mean (Rounds 152–194).

Plot of reference laboratory RCS PAT Sample hateful (assigned value) against non-accredited laboratory RCS PAT Sample mean (Rounds 171–194).

Figure vii shows the ratio of reference laboratory mean to the mean of all laboratories plotted against reference laboratory hateful. Figure 8 shows the ratio of reference laboratory hateful to the mean of all laboratories separated by method (XRD or IR) plotted against reference laboratory mean. Since the proportion of XRD users is higher than IR users in the subset of reference laboratories it can exist expected that the spread of data ratios around unity is tighter for the XRD plot than for the IR plot. No trend in bias by reference laboratory mean mass loading is discernable in either plot. A plot of reference mean divided by all-laboratory mean confronting reference mean value is presented according to interfering matrix in Effigy ix. No difference is observable by matrix and once more no trend as a consequence of loading tin be seen. Figures v–9 also indicate at that place is no difference between the reference laboratories and the others, suggesting that the mean of all laboratories could be used as the assigned value for this analyte as previously suggested.

Ratio of reference laboratory RCS PAT Sample mean (assigned value) to all-laboratory Sample mean plotted against assigned value (Rounds 152–194).

Ratio of reference laboratory RCS PAT Sample mean (assigned value) to all-laboratory RCS PAT Sample mean plotted against assigned value (Rounds 152–194) divided according to method used in all laboratories.

Ratio of reference laboratory Sample mean (assigned value) to all-laboratory Sample means plotted against assigned value (Rounds 152–194) divided according to matrix interference.

It is clear that the variability in RCS analyses every bit expressed through the PAT results has improved dramatically since the concluding assessment 15 years ago. There is a contribution to the reduced variance from reduction in variability in the Sample production and the reduction in use of the colorimetric method, just the remainder is a consequence of factors arising from the manner in which laboratories perform the analyses. The reduction in RSD is consistent across the range of loadings produced in the PAT program. While in that location is a trend of increasing variance with decreased mass, the magnitude of the effect appears to have decreased in the recent data set up. Increasing variance with decreasing mass loading is not a function of major method (XRD vs. IR), nor is information technology affected by the blazon of matrix interference. Variance also is not dependent on the reported accreditation status of the laboratory and this should non be surprising since accreditation is an balls of an effective quality arrangement in place and not necessarily a guarantee of practiced performance, while, conversely, the absence of accreditation does not necessarily imply poor practices and poor results. Accreditation is a valuable assurance to clients of commercial laboratories performing Industrial Hygiene analyses for fee, but may be less useful for laboratories serving but "in-house" clients. Many of the latter may be laboratories using IR, while the accredited laboratories, which, past definition, include the references laboratories, are more probable to use XRD. The excellent agreement between non-accredited and reference laboratories is further evidence that in that location is no difference between these two methods in their ability to produce quality results in the covered mass range.

Conclusion

The average RSD of PAT samples since Round 162 is 19.9%, which is a substantial comeback since the last evaluation between 1990 and 1998. The decline in RSD noted here is a effect of changes in sample production and the decline of the colorimetric method, but it may besides take been driven by improved attending to method implementation by laboratories and improved quality balls parameters, including the apply of new reference materials. The x-mm nylon Dorr-Oliver cyclone operated at i.7 liters per min (LPM) for a full 8-hr shift will provide a mass loading of 41 μg at a concentration 0.05 mgm⁻³, which is merely within the lowest range of current PAT Samples. If there is further increase in variance beneath twoscore–l micrograms loading, it would accept implications for the range of the analytical methods and, if the variance is excessive, it may exist difficult to address for either method. To demonstrate that laboratories are capable of determining samples collected at lower concentrations, or for less than full-shift samples, the AIHA PAT, LLC should consider the production of Samples with lower mass loadings, at least down to 20 μgrand, although it may be technically more than difficult to produce Samples with depression variability at lower masses. A currently available option to ensure analytical accurateness around lower exposure limits or for shorter sample times to address job-specific measurements is to increase the collected mass through the use of a whirlwind that operates at a higher flow rate, where functioning has already been evaluated, ^{(half-dozen–8)} and which take already been used in the field.^(ix) For example, a GK2.69 cyclone (BGI, Inc.) operated at ≈4 LPM will provide ≈100 μgrand under the conditions given above. Nevertheless, to achieve a sample loading within the PAT range for a 4-hr sample at 0.0125 mg/g³ would require a cyclone similar to the FSP-ten (GSA, GmBH) which operates at >11 LPM. Cyclones of this blazon are larger and heavier than ones typically used today and require correspondingly larger and heavier pumps; moreover, at that place is a consequent higher level of complaint from workers regarding the additional burden.⁽¹⁰⁾ Therefore, information technology is recommended that AIHA PAT, LLC should notwithstanding investigate the possibility of providing PAT Samples for RCS in the twenty–50 μm range to back up the analysis of lower target concentration levels.

Footnotes

DISCLAIMER

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the writer(southward) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. References to whatever commercial products and the ACGIH^® TLV^® do non constitute endorsement by the U.S. government. This article is not subject to U. S. copyright constabulary.

References

1. Eller PM, Feng HA, Song RS, Cardinal-Schwartz RJ, Esche CA, Groff JH. Proficiency Analytical Testing (PAT) silica variability, 1990–1998. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1999;sixty:533–539. [Google Scholar]

ii. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH^®) Silica, Crystalline: α-Quartz and Cristobalite. TLV ^® Chemical Substances. seven. Cincinnati, Ohio: ACGIH; 2010. Publication #7DOC-743. [Google Scholar]

iv. Dobson L, Reichmann Fifty, Popp D. Evaluation of quartz residue on cassette interiors of AIHA proficiency samples. J ASTM Int. 2005;2(4):12229. [Google Scholar] Harper M, Lee T, editors. Silica and Associated Respirable Mineral Particles, STP 1565. West Conshohocken, Pa: ASTM International; 2013. pp. 197–203. [Google Scholar]

v. Eller PM, Key-Schwartz RJ, Song RS, Edwards SL, Schlecht PC. Silica method modifications for improved interlaboratory precision. Synergist. 1999 Nov 23–24; [Google Scholar]

6. Lee T, Kim SW, Chisholm WP, Slaven J, Harper M. Operation of high catamenia rate samplers for respirable particle drove. Ann Occup Hyg. 2010;54:697–709. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. Lee T, Lee EG, Kim SW, Chisholm WP, Kashon M, Harper One thousand. Quartz measurement in coal grit with high period rate samplers: Laboratory study. Ann Occup Hyg. 2012;56:413–425. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Stacey P, Lee T, Thorpe A, Roberts P, Frost G, Harper K. Collection efficiencies of high menstruum rate respirable samplers when measuring Arizona road dust and analysis of quartz by 10-ray diffraction. Ann Occup Hyg. 2014;58:512–523. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Esswein EJ, Breitenstein Thou, Snawder J, Kiefer Yard, Sieber WK. Occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica during hydraulic fracturing. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2013;10:347–356. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Coggins MA, Healy CB, Lee T, Harper Thousand. Performance of high flow rate samplers for respirable crystalline silica measurement under field conditions: Preliminary study. In: Harper M, Lee T, editors. Silica and Associated Respirable Mineral Particles STP 1565. W Conshohocken, Pa: ASTM International; 2013. pp. 125–138. [PMC complimentary article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

albaradociary1948.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4698134/

Share this post